Petr Filiznov and Andrey Vyushin near the courthouse, July 2023, Yaroslavl

Petr Filiznov and Andrey Vyushin near the courthouse, July 2023, Yaroslavl

Petr Filiznov and Andrey Vyushin near the courthouse, July 2023, Yaroslavl

Unjust Verdicts

Court of Appeal in Yaroslavl Reduced the Suspended Sentence of Petr Filiznov and Andrey Vyushin by 4 Years

Yaroslavl Region

On October 30, 2023, the judicial chamber of the Yaroslavl Regional Court commuted the sentences of Petr Filiznov and Andrey Vyushin, giving them a suspended sentence of 2.5 years instead of 6.5 years. For the Kuznetsov couple, the suspended sentence of 2.5 years remained the same.

The reason for commuting the sentence of Filiznov and Vyushin was the fact that the court reclassified the charge from Article 282.2(1) of the RF CrC to Аrticle 282.2(2) of the RF CrC. Now th believers are found guilty of participating in the activity of an extremist organization, and not of organizing such activity. The court considered Bible discussions and prayers, including by videoconference, a crime. The verdict has entered into force, but believers can appeal it in cassation procedure.

The defendants' appeal stated: "In this criminal case, during the trial, the court could see that the actions and statements of the convicted persons ... are exclusively peaceful and do not indicate the presence of hatred or enmity. [...] None of the actions listed in this article (of the Criminal Code) was committed by any of the convicted persons in this criminal case. All witnesses for the prosecution questioned during the trial confirmed this."

Speaking about the expert study, which formed the basis of the charges, the defense stated that "the expert's conclusions only allowed for the identification of the peculiarities of the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses and, based on this, to establish the religious affiliation of the convicted persons." The defense also drew attention to the fact that "the court in effect imposes a ban on practicing faith or religion, which violates basic constitutional and international human rights" and that "the law does not recognize the dissemination and practice, including together with fellow believers, of the religion to which the liquidated religious associations belonged, as a sign of extremism."

The Case of Filiznov and Others in Yaroslavl

Case History
In April 2021, the investigation initiated a criminal case under an article for extremism against Andrey Vyushin, Petr Filiznov, as well as the couple Aleksandr and Mariya Kuznetsov. They were suspected of holding meetings for worship “including through the Internet, in which [they] promoted prohibited teachings”. The law enforcement officers conducted searches in Yaroslavl and neighboring Rybinsk, after which four believers were placed in a detention center. After 3 months, the court released them under a ban on certain actions. Vyushin was fitted with a tracking bracelet on his leg, and a control device was installed in his apartment, although his preventive measure did not prohibit him from leaving his home or being in certain places. In August 2022, the case went to court. After 11 months, the believers were sentenced: Andrey Vyushin and Petr Filiznov were given 6.5 years suspended sentence and Aleksandr and Mariya Kuznetsov – 2.5 years.
Timeline

Persons in case

Criminal case

Region:
Yaroslavl Region
Locality:
Yaroslavl
Suspected of:
held religious meetings "including through the Internet, in which [they] promoted prohibited teachings" (from the press release of the Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Yaroslavl Region)
Court case number:
12102780014000004
Initiated:
April 12, 2021
Current case stage:
the verdict entered into force
Investigating:
Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Yaroslavl Region
Articles of Criminal Code of Russian Federation:
282.2 (2)
Court case number:
1-7/2023 (1-387/2022)
Court of First Instance:
Dzerzhinskiy District Court of the City of Yaroslavl
Judge of the Court of First Instance:
Irina Vlasova
Case History